Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Midwifery ; 135: 104018, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pregnant and postpartum women infected by COVID-19 are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including negative effects on their mental health. Brazilian maternal mortality rate due to COVID-19 is 2.5 times higher than overall mortality rates. This study aimed to understand how pregnant/postpartum women experienced the COVID-19 suspicion/investigation or confirmed infection in different Brazilian cities, the pandemic's consequences to women and their families, and their needs to improve maternal health services during public health emergencies. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with 27 women with COVID-19 and 6 of their family members, as part of a multicenter study among 15 maternity hospitals in Brazil. We applied in-depth interviews through telephone calls when women received the diagnostic or had a suspect infection and after 60 days. Another semi-structured interview was applied to their close family members. The interviews were considered through thematic analysis. RESULTS: From the thematic content analysis three major themes emerged from the first and second interviews: (Cucinotta and Vanelli, 2020) assistance received by the woman and newborn in the medical services; (World Health Organization (WHO) 2021) stigma/fear of contamination from health workers and from family and friends reported by the women; (Allotey et al., 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic impact. CONCLUSION: Before the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine, pregnant women experienced fear of death, hospitalization, quarantine, loss of family members, and financial repercussions, resulting in physical, psychological, and socioeconomic impacts on these women's lives.

2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 164(3): 1019-1027, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38009566

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare maternal and perinatal outcomes among women with obesity, overweight, and normal body mass index, associated with COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and postpartum. METHOD: Prospective Cohort Study, within the REBRACO (Brazilian Network of COVID-19 in Pregnancy) multicenter initiative. Confirmed positive cases of SARS-CoV-2 were included, and women categorized into three groups according to their pre-pregnancy BMI: obesity (BMI ≥ 30), overweight (BMI <30 but >25), and normal BMI. Sociodemographic, clinical, and obstetric characteristics and different maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared, and a multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate factors independently associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-nine women positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection were considered, and 202 had available data on maternal BMI for the current analysis. Overall, 72 (35.6%)obese, 68 (33.6%) overweight, and 60 (29.7%) normal BMI. Obesity was associated with increased adverse clinical outcomes including sepsis (P = 0.02), acute respiratory distress syndrome (P = 0.002), and the need for mechanical ventilation (P = 0.044). Considering perinatal outcomes, a multiple regression model confirmed obesity as an independent factor associated with adverse results (adjusted odds ratio 3.73, 95% CI 1.54-9.08). CONCLUSION: Obesity and overweight were associated with worse clinical outcomes, severe/critical COVID-19, and adverse perinatal outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Overweight/complications , Overweight/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Body Mass Index , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Postpartum Period
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 605, 2023 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37620835

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Latin America has the highest Cesarean Section Rates (CSR) in the world. Robson's Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS) was developed to enable understanding the CSR in different groups of women, classified according to obstetric characteristics into one of ten groups. The size of each CS group may provide helpful data on quality of care in a determined region or setting. Data can potentially be used to compare the impact of conditions such as maternal morbidity on CSR. The objective of this study is to understand the impact of Severe Maternal Morbidity (SMM) on CSR in ten different groups of RTGCS. METHODS: Secondary analysis of childbirth information from 2018 to 2021, including 8 health facilities from 5 Latin American and Caribbean countries (Bolivia, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic), using a surveillance database (SIP-Perinatal Information System, in Spanish) implemented in different settings across Latin America. Women were classified into one of RTGCS. The frequency of each group and its respective CSR were described. Furthermore, the sample was divided into two groups, according to maternal outcomes: women without SMM and those who experienced SMM, considering Potentially Life-threatening Conditions, Maternal Near Miss and Maternal Death as the continuum of morbidity. RESULTS: Available data were obtained from 92,688 deliveries using the Robson Classification. Overall CSR was around 38%. Group 5 was responsible for almost one-third of cesarean sections. SMM occurred in 6.7% of cases. Among these cases, the overall CSR was almost 70% in this group. Group 10 had a major role (preterm deliveries). Group 5 (previous Cesarean section) had a very high CSR within the group, regardless of the occurrence of maternal morbidity (over 80%). CONCLUSION: Cesarean section rate was higher in women experiencing SMM than in those without SMM in Latin America. SMM was associated with higher Cesarean section rates, especially in groups 1 and 3. Nevertheless, group 5 was the major contributor to the overall CSR.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Latin America/epidemiology , Racial Groups , Parturition , Family
4.
Placenta ; 139: 190-199, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37442007

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Placental morphology findings in SARS-CoV-2 infection are considered nonspecific, although the role of trimester and severity of infection are underreported. Therefore, we aimed to investigate abnormal placental morphology, according to these two criteria. METHODS: This is an ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of pregnant women with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, managed in one maternity, from March 2020 to October 2021. Charting of clinical/obstetric history, trimester and severity of COVID-19 infection, and maternal/perinatal outcomes were done. Placental morphological findings were classified into maternal and fetal circulatory injury and acute/chronic inflammation. We further compared findings with women with suspected disease which tested negative for COVID-19. Diseases' trimester of infection and clinical severity guided the analysis of confirmed COVID-19 cases. RESULTS: Ninety-one placental discs from 85 women were eligible as a COVID-19 group, and 42 discs from 41 women in negative COVID-19 group. SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in 68.2% during third trimester, and 6.6% during first; 16.5% were asymptomatic, 61.5% non-severe and 22.0% severe symptomatic (two maternal deaths). Preterm birth occurred in 33.0% (one fetal death). Global maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) were significant in COVID-19 group whether compared with negative COVID-19 tests group; however, fetal vascular malperfusion lesions and low-grade chronic villitis were not. Three placentas had COVID-19 placentitis. Decidual arteriopathy was associated with infection in first/mid trimester, and chorangiosis in asymptomatic infections. DISCUSSION: Placental abnormalities after an infection by COVID-19 were more frequent after first/mid-trimester infections. Extensive placental lesions are rare, although they may be more common upon underlying medical conditions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fetal Diseases , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Premature Birth , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/pathology , Placenta/pathology , Prospective Studies , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/pathology , Premature Birth/pathology , Inflammation/pathology , Fetal Diseases/pathology , Severity of Illness Index
5.
Pregnancy Hypertens ; 31: 32-37, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525933

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To analyze soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factors (PlGF) concentrations and their ratio in pregnant and postpartum women with suspected COVID-19, and further investigate conditions associated with an increased ratio (sFlt-1/PlGF > 38), including preeclampsia (PE) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). STUDY DESIGN: The present study is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort. Blood samples were collected at time of COVID-19 investigation and the serum measurements of sFlt-1 and PlGF were performed. Clinical background, SARS-CoV-2 infection characteristics, maternal and perinatal outcomes were further analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum measurements of sFlt-1 and PlGF; obstetrics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 97 SARS-CoV-2 unvaccinated women with suspected infection were considered, 76 were COVID-19 positive cases and 21 COVID-19 negative. Among COVID-19 positive cases, 09 presented with SARS and 11 were diagnosed with PE, of which 6 had SARS-CoV-2 infection in first and second trimester (04 with sFlt-1/PlGF ≥ 38) and 05 with PE and COVID-19 diagnosed at the same time, during third trimester (03 with sFlt-1/PlGF ≥ 38). Five presented with PE with severe features. sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was significantly higher in the COVID-19 positive/PE positive group compared to COVID-19 positive/PE negative group (p-value = 0.005), with no increase in cases complicated by SARS. CONCLUSIONS: sFlt-1/PlGF ratio could be a useful tool for differential diagnosis and adequate counseling among cases of COVID-19 and PE, especially if severe disease. COVID-19 early in pregnancy could potentially be a risk factor for PE later during gestation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pre-Eclampsia , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Placenta , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 , SARS-CoV-2 , Placenta Growth Factor , Biomarkers , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
6.
BMC pregnancy childbirth ; 23(1): 605, 2023.
Article in English | LILACS, BNUY, MMyP, UY-BNMED | ID: biblio-1518570

ABSTRACT

Background: Latin America has the highest Cesarean Section Rates (CSR) in the world. Robson's Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS) was developed to enable understanding the CSR in different groups of women, classified according to obstetric characteristics into one of ten groups. The size of each CS group may provide helpful data on quality of care in a determined region or setting. Data can potentially be used to compare the impact of conditions such as maternal morbidity on CSR. The objective of this study is to understand the impact of Severe Maternal Morbidity (SMM) on CSR in ten different groups of RTGCS. Methods: Secondary analysis of childbirth information from 2018 to 2021, including 8 health facilities from 5 Latin American and Caribbean countries (Bolivia, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic), using a surveillance database (SIP-Perinatal Information System, in Spanish) implemented in different settings across Latin America. Women were classified into one of RTGCS. The frequency of each group and its respective CSR were described. Furthermore, the sample was divided into two groups, according to maternal outcomes: women without SMM and those who experienced SMM, considering Potentially Life-threatening Conditions, Maternal Near Miss and Maternal Death as the continuum of morbidity. Results: Available data were obtained from 92,688 deliveries using the Robson Classification. Overall CSR was around 38%. Group 5 was responsible for almost one-third of cesarean sections. SMM occurred in 6.7% of cases. Among these cases, the overall CSR was almost 70% in this group. Group 10 had a major role (preterm deliveries). Group 5 (previous Cesarean section) had a very high CSR within the group, regardless of the occurrence of maternal morbidity (over 80%). Conclusion: Cesarean section rate was higher in women experiencing SMM than in those without SMM in Latin America. SMM was associated with higher Cesarean section rates, especially in groups 1 and 3. Nevertheless, group 5 was the major contributor to the overall CSR. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Cesarean Section , Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate , Parturition , Latin America/epidemiology
7.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 11758, 2022 07 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35817818

ABSTRACT

Brazil presented a very high number of maternal deaths and evident delays in healthcare. We aimed at evaluating the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated outcomes in the obstetric population. We conducted a prospective cohort study in 15 Brazilian centers including symptomatic pregnant or postpartum women with suspected COVID-19 from Feb/2020 to Feb/2021. Women were followed from suspected infection until the end of pregnancy. We analyzed maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes associated with confirmed COVID-19 infection and SARS, determining unadjusted risk ratios. In total, 729 symptomatic women with suspected COVID-19 were initially included. Among those investigated for COVID-19, 51.3% (n = 289) were confirmed COVID-19 and 48% (n = 270) were negative. Initially (before May 15th), only 52.9% of the suspected cases were tested and it was the period with the highest proportion of ICU admission and maternal deaths. Non-white ethnicity (RR 1.78 [1.04-3.04]), primary schooling or less (RR 2.16 [1.21-3.87]), being overweight (RR 4.34 [1.04-19.01]) or obese (RR 6.55 [1.57-27.37]), having public prenatal care (RR 2.16 [1.01-4.68]), planned pregnancies (RR 2.09 [1.15-3.78]), onset of infection in postpartum period (RR 6.00 [1.37-26.26]), chronic hypertension (RR 2.15 [1.37-4.10]), pre-existing diabetes (RR 3.20 [1.37-7.46]), asthma (RR 2.22 [1.14-4.34]), and anaemia (RR 3.15 [1.14-8.71]) were associated with higher risk for SARS. The availability of tests and maternal outcomes varied throughout the pandemic period of the study; the beginning was the most challenging period, with worse outcomes. Socially vulnerable, postpartum and previously ill women were more likely to present SARS related to COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Maternal Death , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
8.
Pregnancy Hypertens ; 28: 168-173, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35568019

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of preeclampsia among cases of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and the association between both conditions, in a multicenter cohort of Brazilian women with respiratory symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Ancillary analysis of the Brazilian Network of COVID-19 in Obstetrics (REBRACO) study. We performed a nested case-control analysis selecting all women with COVID-19 and compared outcomes between women with and without PE. MAIN OUTCOMES: Maternal, gestational, and clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes. MEASURES: Prevalence ratio (PR) and its 95%CI for each of the predictors and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 203 women were included: 21 (10.3%) in PE group and 182 (89.7%) in non-PE group. Preeclampsia was not different among women with and without COVID-19 (10.3% vs 13.1%, p-value = 0.41), neither complication such as eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Chronic hypertension (33.4%) (p < 0.01) and obesity (60.0%) (p = 0.03) were the most frequent comorbidities in PE group, and they were significantly more frequent in this group. Women with PE had more cesarean section (RR 5.54 [1.33 - 23.14]) and their neonates were more frequently admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (PR 2.46[1.06 - 5.69]), most likely due to preterm-birth-related complications. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PE among women with COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was around 10%; women with COVID-19 and a history of chronic hypertension or obesity are more likely to have preeclampsia. Cesarean section is increased among women with PE and COVID-19, with increased rates of neonatal admission to intensive care units, mostly due to prematurity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Pre-Eclampsia , Pregnancy Complications , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cesarean Section , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Obesity , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology
9.
PLoS One ; 16(7): e0254977, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34297740

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic posed major challenges in obstetric health care services. Preparedness, development, and implementation of new protocols were part of the needed response. This study aims to describe the strategies implemented and the perspectives of health managers on the challenges to face the pandemic in 16 different maternity hospitals that comprise a multicenter study in Brazil, called REBRACO (Brazilian network of COVID-19 during pregnancy). METHODS: Mixed-method study, with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative data on the infrastructure of the units, maternal and perinatal health indicators, modifications on staff and human resources, from January to July/2020. Also, information on total number of cases, and availability for COVID-19 testing. A qualitative study by purposeful and saturation sampling was undertaken with healthcare managers, to understand perspectives on local challenges in facing the pandemic. RESULTS: Most maternities early implemented their contingency plan. REBRACO centers reported 338 confirmed COVID-19 cases among pregnant and post-partum women up to July 2020. There were 29 maternal deaths and 15 (51.8%) attributed to COVID-19. All maternities performed relocation of beds designated to labor ward, most (75%) acquired mechanical ventilators, only the minority (25%) installed new negative air pressure rooms. Considering human resources, around 40% hired extra health professionals and increased weekly workload and the majority (68.7%) also suspended annual leaves. Only one center implemented universal screening for childbirth and 6 (37.5%) implemented COVID-19 testing for all suspected cases, while around 60% of the centers only tested moderate/severe cases with hospital admission. Qualitative results showed that main challenges experienced were related to the fear of the virus, concerns about reliability of evidence and lack of resources, with a clear need for mental health support among health professionals. CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that maternities of the REBRACO initiative underwent major changes in facing the pandemic, with limitations on testing, difficulties in infrastructure and human resources. Leadership, continuous training, implementation of evidence-based protocols and collaborative initiatives are key to transpose the fear of the virus and ascertain adequate healthcare inside maternities, especially in low and middle-income settings. Policy makers need to address the specificities in considering reproductive health and childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic and prioritize research and timely testing availability.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19 , Pandemics , Parturition , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology
10.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 152(3): 401-408, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33064850

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of analgesia during labor in women who had a vaginal birth and to determine the factors associated with its use. METHODS: A secondary analysis was performed of the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health, a cross-sectional, facility-based survey including 359 healthcare facilities in 29 countries. The prevalence of analgesia use for vaginal birth in different countries was reported according to the Human Development Index (HDI). Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of the participants with and without analgesia were compared. The prevalence ratios were compared across countries, HDI groups, and regions using a design-based χ2 test. RESULTS: Among the 221 345 women who had a vaginal birth, only 4% received labor analgesia, mainly epidural. The prevalence of women receiving analgesia was significantly higher in countries with a higher HDI than in countries with a lower HDI. Education was significantly associated with increased use of analgesia; nulliparous women and women undergoing previous cesarean delivery had a significantly increased likelihood of receiving analgesia. CONCLUSION: Use of analgesia for women undergoing labor and vaginal delivery was low, specifically in low-HDI countries. Whether low use of analgesia reflects women's desire or an unmet need for pain relief requires further studies.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities , Labor Pain/drug therapy , Labor, Obstetric , Maternal-Child Health Services/standards , Prenatal Care , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Global Health , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pain Management , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires , World Health Organization , Young Adult
11.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 152(3): 339-344, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32920856

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of pre-eclampsia on cesarean delivery by using the Robson classification. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study including all women who delivered in a referral maternity hospital in southeast Brazil from January 2017 to February 2018. Women were classified into 1 of 10 Robson groups and then further subdivided into pre-eclampsia (PE) and non-PE (NPE) groups. Frequency of cesarean was determined for each group and compared by using χ2 and prevalence ratio. RESULTS: Overall, 3102 women were included, of whom 1578 (50.9%) delivered by cesarean. Classification in Robson group 5 was the most frequent among all women (n=727, 23.4%). In the PE group (n=258, 8.3%), group 10 was the most frequent classification (n=120, 46.5%); in NPE, Robson group 5 was the most frequency (n=682, 24.0%). Pre-eclampsia was associated with a higher occurrence of cesarean (77.5% vs 48.4%; prevalence ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.82-2.82), owing to higher rates in Robson groups 1, 5, and 10. CONCLUSION: Pre-eclampsia was associated with a higher occurrence of cesarean delivery in some Robson groups. Robson classification may be used to evaluate the impact of specific conditions at a facility level to help plan future interventions to optimize the use of cesarean.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Pre-Eclampsia , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
12.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 2(3): 100168, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33345887

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increased incidence of cancer in women of childbearing age and improvements on treatment for preserving fertility have led to higher frequency of pregnancy during or after cancer treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with cancer and pregnancy and, as a secondary analysis, to compare outcomes of women with active disease and with remission before pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective study of women followed up at a referral center owing to a history of cancer or cancer diagnosed during pregnancy. Data on sociodemographic information, obstetrical history, types of neoplasia, treatments offered, antenatal follow-up, and maternal and perinatal outcomes were retrieved from medical chart review. A descriptive analysis was performed and a comparison among women with active and nonactive disease was performed using Student t-test and chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 66 women were included in a 5-year period. The most frequent types of cancer were breast (33%), hematologic (21%), brain (11%), cervical (9%), and ovarian (5%) cancers. There were 39 participants (59%) who had active disease and 26 who received oncological treatment during pregnancy, and 23 (34.8%) had a vaginal delivery. There were 4 women who needed intensive care unit admission postpartum. A total of 18 (29.5%) deliveries were at term, most newborns (59%) with adequate weight for gestational age and only 1 had Apgar score lower than 7 in the fifth minute of life. There was 1 stillbirth. The active invasive cancer during pregnancy group showed a higher rate of preterm birth and lower birthweight with significant statistical difference (P=.03 and P<.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer was the most frequent type of cancer in our cohort. Most deliveries were preterm, with adequate birthweight. Women with active cancer are more likely to have a preterm childbirth and newborns with lower birthweight.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Premature Birth , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Stillbirth
13.
Biomed Res Int ; 2020: 9740232, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32724823

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of nonsevere maternal morbidity (including overall health, domestic and sexual violence, functionality, and mental health) in women during antenatal care and further analyze factors associated with compromised mental functioning and clinical health by administration of the WHO's WOICE 2.0 instrument. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a referral center in Brazil with an interview and questionnaire administered to pregnant women at 28 weeks of gestation and beyond. Data collection and management were supported by REDCAP software. A descriptive analysis was performed, and a multiple regression analysis also investigated factors associated with impairment in mental conditions, functionality, and clinical health. RESULTS: 533 women at a mean age of 28.9 years (±6.7) were included, and the majority had a partner (77.1%) and secondary education (67.7%). Exposure to violence occurred in 6.8%, and 12.7% reported substance use. Sexual satisfaction was reported by the vast majority (91.7%), although almost one-fifth were sexually abstinent. Overall, women reported very good and good health (72%), despite being told that they had a medical condition (66%). There was an overall rate of anxiety in 29.9%, depression in 39.5%, and impaired functioning in 20.4%. The perception of an abnormal clinical condition was the only factor independently associated with impaired functioning and mental health in the multiple regression model. Obesity was independently associated with clinical impairment. CONCLUSION: During antenatal care, pregnant women in the study reported having a high rate of anxiety, depression, impaired functioning, and substance use. These issues can affect a woman's health and should be further addressed for specific interventions and improved quality of care.


Subject(s)
Prenatal Care/psychology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Women's Health/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/etiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/etiology , Depression/psychology , Domestic Violence/psychology , Domestic Violence/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Morbidity , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Pregnant Women , Prevalence , Quality of Health Care , Risk Factors , Sex Offenses/psychology , Sex Offenses/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , World Health Organization , Young Adult
15.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 149(2): 148-153, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32037536

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe maternal and perinatal outcomes for women with chronic hypertension, comparing those with superimposed pre-eclampsia (SPE) with those without pre-eclampsia (NPE). METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital in Brazil, the records of women with chronic hypertension were reviewed between January 1, 2012, and May 31, 2017, in order to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes among those with and without SPE. Poisson regression was performed to investigate factors independently associated with severe pre-eclampsia. RESULTS: Of 385 women with chronic hypertension included in the study, 167 were in the SPE group and 218 in the NPE group. The majority were white, overweight (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 ), with mean age around 31 years. Adverse neonatal outcomes were significantly more prevalent among women with SPE, including small for gestational age (SPE 17.46% vs NPE 9.63%, P=0.01), low birth weight (SPE 2577 g ± 938 vs NPE 3128 g ± 723, P=0.003), neonatal intensive care unit admission (SPE 44.91% vs NPE 18.34%, P=0.08), and incidence of cesarean delivery (SPE 79.64% vs NPE 62.38%, P=0.003). Fetal growth restriction (PR [prevalence ratio] 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-4.94) and previous pre-eclampsia (PR 1.96, 95% CI 1.17-3.28) were associated with severe pre-eclampsia. CONCLUSION: SPE is associated with prematurity and higher rates of admission to neonatal intensive care unit. Fetal growth restriction and previous pre-eclampsia are factors associated with severe complications of pre-eclampsia.


Subject(s)
Fetal Growth Retardation/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
16.
Biomed Res Int ; 2019: 7596165, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895195

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the use of analgesia for vaginal birth, in women with and without severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and to describe sociodemographic, clinical, and obstetric characteristics and maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with labor analgesia. METHODS: Secondary analysis of the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health (WHO-MCS), a global cross-sectional study performed between May 2010 and December 2011 in 29 countries. Women who delivered vaginally and had an SMM were included in this analysis and were then divided into two groups: those who received and those who did not receive analgesia for labor/delivery. We further compared maternal characteristics and maternal and perinatal outcomes between these two groups. RESULTS: From 314,623 women originally included in WHO-MCS, 9,788 developed SMM and delivered vaginally, 601 (6.1%) with analgesia and 9,187 (93.9%) without analgesia. Women with SMM were more likely to receive analgesia than those who did not experience SMM. Global distribution of SMM was similar; however, the use of analgesia was less prevalent in Africa. Higher maternal education, previous cesarean section, and nulliparity were factors associated with analgesia use. Analgesia was not an independent factor associated with an increase of severe maternal outcome (Maternal Near Miss + Maternal Death). CONCLUSIONS: The overall use of analgesia for vaginal delivery is low but women with SMM are more likely to receive analgesia during labor. Social conditions are closely linked with the likelihood of having analgesia during delivery and such a procedure is not associated with increased adverse maternal outcomes. Expanding the availability of analgesia in different levels of care should be a concern worldwide.


Subject(s)
Analgesia/statistics & numerical data , Infant Health/statistics & numerical data , Internationality , Labor, Obstetric/physiology , Maternal Health/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Mortality , Surveys and Questionnaires , World Health Organization , Adult , Female , Humans , Multivariate Analysis , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prevalence , Young Adult
17.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 141 Suppl 1: 48-54, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29851111

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare scores on the 36-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 tool (WHODAS-36) for postpartum women across a continuum of morbidity and to validate the 12-item version (WHODAS-12). METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the Brazilian retrospective cohort study on long-term repercussions of severe maternal morbidity. We determined mean, median, and percentile values for WHODAS-36 total score and for each domain, and percentile values for WHODAS-12 total score in postpartum women divided into three groups: "no," "nonsevere," and "severe" morbidities. RESULTS: The WHODAS-36 mean total scores were 11.58, 18.31, and 19.19, respectively for no, nonsevere, and severe morbidity. There was a dose-dependent effect on scores for each domain of WHODAS-36 according to the presence and severity of morbidity. The diagnostic validity of WHODAS-12 was determined by comparing it with WHODAS-36 as a "gold standard." The best cut-off point for diagnosing dysfunctionality was the 95th percentile. CONCLUSION: The upward trend of WHODAS-36 total mean value scores of women with no morbidity compared with those with morbidity along a severity continuum may reflect the impact of morbidity on postpartum functioning.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Postpartum Period , Adult , Brazil , Female , Humans , Male , Morbidity , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , World Health Organization , Young Adult
18.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 141 Suppl 1: 39-47, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29851113

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To validate the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and the occurrence of maternal morbidity. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the Brazilian retrospective cohort study on long-term repercussions of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among women who delivered at a tertiary facility (COMMAG study). We compared WHODAS-12 and WHODAS-36 scores of women with and without SMM using measures of central tendency and variability, tests for instruments' agreement (Bland-Altman plot), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Cronbach alpha coefficient for internal consistency. RESULTS: The COMMAG study enrolled 638 women up to 5 years postpartum. Although the median WHODAS-36 and -12 scores for all women were statistically different (13.04 and 11.76, respectively; P<0.001), there was a strong linear correlation between them. Furthermore, the mean difference and the differences in variance analyses demonstrated agreement of total scores between the two versions. CFA demonstrated how the WHODAS-12 questions are divided into six previously defined factors and Cronbach alpha showed good internal consistency. CONCLUSION: WHODAS-12 demonstrated agreement with WHODAS-36 for total score and was a good instrument for screening functioning and disability among postpartum women, with and without SMM.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Brazil , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , World Health Organization
19.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 141 Suppl 1: 55-60, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29851117

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the scores of postpartum women using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 36-item tool (WHODAS-36), considering different morbidities. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of women who delivered at a referral maternity in Brazil and were classified with and without severe maternal morbidity (SMM). WHODAS-36 was used to assess functioning in postpartum women. Percentile distribution of total WHODAS score was compared across three groups: Percentile (P)<10, 1090. Cases of SMM were categorized and WHODAS-36 score was assessed according to hypertension, hemorrhage, or other conditions. RESULTS: A total of 638 women were enrolled: 64 had mean scores below P<10 (1.09) and 66 were above P>90 (41.3). Of women scoring above P>90, those with morbidity had a higher mean score than those without (44.6% vs 36.8%, P=0.879). Women with higher WHODAS-36 scores presented more complications during pregnancy, especially hypertension (47.0% vs 37.5%, P=0.09). Mean scores among women with any complication were higher than those with no morbidity (19.0 vs 14.2, P=0.01). WHODAS-36 scores were higher among women with hypertensive complications (19.9 vs 16.0, P=0.004), but lower among those with hemorrhagic complications (13.8 vs 17.7, P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Complications during pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium increase long-term WHODAS-36 scores, demonstrating a persistent impact on functioning among women, up to 5 years postpartum.


Subject(s)
Hypertension/epidemiology , Postpartum Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Brazil , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , Humans , Morbidity , Parturition , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
20.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 143(1): 101-107, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29572831

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of proteinuria on pregnancy outcomes among women with pre-eclampsia. METHODS: The present retrospective cohort study included patients with pre-eclampsia who delivered at a referral maternity hospital in Brazil between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. Patients were stratified into three groups based on 24-hour urinary protein excretion during pregnancy: mild (0.3-<2.0 g), severe (2.0-<5.0 g), and massive (≥5.0 g). RESULTS: There were 293 patients included in the study; 88, 129, and 76 had mild, severe, and massive proteinuria, respectively. Chronic hypertension was the most frequent pre-existing condition among all women (86 [29.4%]). The mean pregnancy duration at the onset of maternal pre-eclampsia was longest in the mild group compared and decreased with increasing proteinuria severity (P<0.001). Preterm delivery was recorded among 205 of 293 (70.0%) neonates; there were 66 (22.5%) neonates that were preterm and in the massive proteinuria group. The incidence of severe pre-eclampsia was lowest in the mild proteinuria group (P=0.002) and tended to occur at 34 weeks. Cesarean delivery rates exceeded 80.0% in all groups. Most patients assessed at 40-60 days postpartum remained proteinuric (40/61[66%]). CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying the severity of proteinuria could identify a subgroup of women with pre-eclampsia at increased risk of adverse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Pre-Eclampsia/physiopathology , Pregnancy Outcome , Proteinuria/physiopathology , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...